The public meeting at Roundhill School to discuss Tesco’s plans was packed on Monday evening with standing room only and around 250 people attending. There was overwhelming concern about the detrimental effect the enlarged Tesco store will have on our community, both in terms of traffic congestion and the damage it will do to our smaller retailers. Issues of road safety for pedestrians was raised as well as concerns for the character of our town being irrevocably changed.
Dr. Matthew Frost, a civil engineer who teaches Highway Engineering at Loughborough University, was on the panel and fielded questions about road capacity. People wanted to know how the problem of congestion could be alleviated if the larger store is built. He stated that the remedy to overcome the traffic problem is not straightforward, especially given that the Middle Street/Station Road junction is already at capacity. Alternative routes for traffic could be looked at, for instance Queen’s Road, and traffic light timings could be changed at Middle Street/Station Road as well as junctions further afield. The proposed left turn off Station Road into the proposed double deck car park may alleviate the junction and the tram should increase the junction’s capacity if people change from car to tram use. However, he stated that Tesco’s Transport Assessment has only looked at the Middle Street/Station Road junction and not at the knock-on effect of congestion on Broadgate and Chilwell Road. He concluded that the new store will inevitably bring more traffic to Beeston and that traffic congestion will worsen, despite all the potential strategies he mentioned.
Steve Carr, County Councillor for Beeston North stated that the County Council had concluded that the Middle Street/Station Road junction “will not work”.
One audience member asked whether the land, which is currently designated for retail use, could be re-designated when the Local Plan is updated with the new Local Development Framework. Nick Palmer MP said that re-designation was possible and in that event Tesco would have to be compensated. However, he stated that future generations may thank us for it.
Nick Palmer asked for a show of hands on whether people would prefer a Tesco or for the site to remain derelict, hypothetically, for the next ten years. The response was overwhelming. People would prefer an empty space and no development at all if it meant Tesco would not build!
Everyone was urged to write an objection to the council if they hadn’t already done so. No deadline has yet been set.